O truque inteligente de epicteto que ninguém é Discutindo
Stoic ethics is naturalistic, and thus very modern in nature, but it—to put it in rather anachronistic terms—does not simplistically erase Hume’s is/ought divide.
In spite of all his Indian stoicism, Curumilla literally seized the food as soon as it appeared, and devoured it greedily.
Apoproēgmena = dispreferred indifferents, externals, outside of virtue that—other things being equal—should be avoided.
As a result of this dichotomy, a large class of objects were left unassigned and thus regarded as indifferent.
, and later critics included Pascal. In part in order to preempt such reactions, according to Sellars, one of the Neostoic texts began with the following cautious endorsement: “philosophie in generall is profitable unto a Christian man, if it be well and rightly used: but pelo kinde of philosophie is more profitable and neerer approaching unto Christianitie than the philosophie of the Stoicks.
Para alcanzar la felicidad, Epicuro proponÃa qual se tuviera preferencia por los placeres del alma previamente que por los del cuerpo. Sin embargo, pelo rechazaba ni condenaba a los segundos.
The broader Stoic approach to logic has been characterized as a type of propositional logic, anticipating aspects of Frege’s work (Beaney 1997). Stoic logic made a fundamental distinction between “sayables†and “assertibles.†The former are a broader category that includes assertibles as well as questions, imperatives, oaths, invocations and even curses. referência usada The assertibles then are self-complete sayables that we use to make statements. For instance, “If Zeno is in Athens than Zeno is in Greece†is a conditional composite assertible, constructed out of the individual simple assertibles “Zeno is in Athens†and “Zeno is in Greece.
Seamus Mac Suibhne has described the practices of spiritual exercises as influencing those of reflective practice.[35] Many parallels between Stoic spiritual exercises and modern cognitive behavioral therapy have been identified.[36]
A philosophy that flourished in ancient Greece and Rome. Stoics believed that people should strictly restrain their emotions in order to attain happiness and wisdom; hence, they refused to demonstrate either joy or sorrow.
Living according to reason and virtue, they held, is to live in harmony with the divine order of the universe, in recognition of the common reason and essential value of all people.
The idea was to be free of suffering through apatheia (Greek: ἀπάθεια; literally, "without passion") or peace of mind,[28] where peace of mind was understood in the ancient sense—being objective or having "clear judgment" and the maintenance of equanimity in the face of life's highs and lows.
Many Stoics—such as Seneca and Epictetus—emphasized that because "virtue is sufficient for happiness", a sage would be emotionally resilient to misfortune.
Los hombres nacen con un alma[7]​ tais como si fuera una «tabla rasa» pero cuando adquieren cierta madurez pueden, mediante el uso de una «fantasÃa» aceptar este rechazar las impresiones que los «iconos» qual desprenden las cosas fijan en el alma tais como conceptos.
Dice el necio en su corazon : no hay Dios. Se han corrompido, hacen obras abominables; no hay quien haga el bien…
Para mais informacoes Resumo de Livro